New York City Shareholder And Partnership Dispute Lawyer

Last updated on July 31, 2026

Owner disputes are different from ordinary business lawsuits because the company itself is usually the battlefield. The same people fighting over money, control or trust may also control payroll, bank access, records, customer relationships and the daily operation of the business.

Desai, Raveica, Raveica & Arshad, P.C., represents businesses, shareholders, members and partners in high-stakes owner disputes throughout New York City, including:

• Midtown Manhattan
• Financial District (FiDi)
• Silicon Alley, Flatiron, SoHo
• Dumbo, Brooklyn Navy Yard
• Long Island City (LIC)

We handle the full range of what many businesses call a “business divorce,” including:

• Deadlock
• Squeeze-outs
• Diversion of funds
• Concealment
• Books-and-records fights
• Fiduciary misconduct
• Fraudulent owner conduct
• Compensation and distribution disputes
• Litigation over buyouts, dissolution and control

These cases are emotional. But they are won with documents, leverage and speed. The side that secures the records, understands the governing agreement and moves first on the right relief often changes the trajectory of the entire dispute.

Business Divorce Cases We Handle

Closely held businesses do not need public market complexity to generate serious owner litigation. A 50/50 deadlock can stop a company from functioning. A majority owner can freeze out a minority owner by cutting off information, compensation or distributions. A partner can siphon business opportunities, run expenses through the company, divert customer relationships or compete from inside the enterprise. A controlling owner can manipulate the books, conceal related-party transactions, or use access to the banking and accounting systems to create facts on the ground before a lawsuit is filed.

We handle those fights directly. That includes disputes involving operating agreements, shareholder agreements, partnership agreements, alleged dilution, capital calls, governance deadlocks, compensation and bonus disputes, misuse of company funds, oppressive conduct, fraudulent concealment, and demands for access to books and records.

Our Business Divorce Lawyers Understand How New York Law Governs Shareholder And Partnership Disputes

The rights available in an owner dispute depend on both the governing documents and the applicable New York statute. The problem is the two do not always align. Corporations are governed by the Business Corporation Law (BCL), LLCs by the New York LLC Law and partnerships by the New York Partnership Law. Each statute creates different inspection rights, dissolution standards and fiduciary duty frameworks.

Key statutes include:

• Business Corporation Law Section 1104-a: Allows shareholders to petition for judicial dissolution when those in control engage in oppressive conduct, including freezing out minority owners from information, compensation or distributions.
• Business Corporation Law Section 624: Grants shareholders the right to inspect corporate books and records for any proper purpose related to their ownership interest.
• Business Corporation Law Section 623: Allows shareholders to obtain the shareholder list for purposes connected to their ownership, critical for proxy fights or coordinated minority action.
• New York LLC Law Section 702: Governs LLC dissolution and allows members to petition when it is not reasonably practicable to carry on the business in conformity with the operating agreement.
• New York Partnership Law: Governs partnerships and defines fiduciary duties of loyalty and care that partners owe each other.

A right available to a shareholder in a corporation may not exist in the same form for an LLC member and vice versa. Entity structure determines strategy. Informal titles and assumptions do not determine legal rights – the documents and the applicable statute do. If you need guidance on partnership rights specific to your situation, we can help.

What Changes Leverage Early?

In shareholder and partnership disputes, the early questions are practical as much as legal. Who controls the bank accounts? Who controls the accountant? Who has the passwords to payroll, QuickBooks, the customer list, the cap table and the shared drive? Who can speak for the company today? Has anyone changed access, deleted data, altered vendor relationships or moved money in anticipation of a fight?

Those facts matter because they determine what relief may be needed immediately. In some cases, the right first move is a records demand. In others, it may be an injunction application, a declaratory-judgment action, an accounting claim or litigation designed to stop further diversion and preserve the status quo. Waiting is often costly because owner disputes can deteriorate quickly once one side realizes litigation is coming.

Key factors that shape early leverage include:

• Control of bank accounts, bookkeeping systems and payroll
• Access to tax returns, cap tables, board or member records, and communications
• Control of customer relationships, vendor contracts and employee loyalties
• Signs that money is moving, records are being withheld or ownership is being reframed after the fact

Understanding who holds these advantages at the outset often determines how quickly and effectively a dispute can be resolved.

Business Divorce And Emergency Relief

Many owner disputes require a faster response than the parties expected. If one owner is draining accounts, misusing confidential information, destroying records, diverting clients or locking the other side out of the business, waiting for ordinary litigation timing may not be enough. Emergency relief can be available, but only when the facts are organized and the requested relief is precise.

These cases often turn on whether the court can see immediate, irreparable harm or an urgent need to preserve the status quo while the merits are litigated. That means emails, texts, bank records, access logs, payroll entries, reimbursement records and communications with vendors or employees can matter at the beginning, not just at the end.

Business divorce litigation in New York also repeatedly shows that rights are determined by the governing documents, not by assumptions. The operating agreement, shareholder agreement, partnership agreement, and admission or transfer provisions often decide who actually has rights to vote, inspect records, force a process or challenge a transaction. In owner litigation, the documents usually matter more than the title somebody has been using informally.

What Discovery Uncovers In Owner Disputes

Owner dispute discovery is usually where the story changes. The decisive evidence may be hidden in bookkeeping entries, unreconciled distributions, credit-card charges, side agreements, texts with key employees, emails to accountants, hidden related-party vendors or a second set of financial assumptions the company never showed the other owners.

A disciplined discovery plan in these cases often targets bank records, general ledgers, tax returns, payroll records, shareholder or membership ledgers, board and member minutes, communications with accountants, financing records, reimbursement documentation, customer and vendor communications, and the messages that explain why key decisions were really made. Depositions matter. So do third-party subpoenas. So does understanding what data may exist on phones and in shared-drive environments that were never treated as formal corporate records.

If the case is about concealment or self-dealing, discovery should be built to follow the money. If it is about control, it should be built to uncover who exercised authority and how. If it is about a buyout or dissolution, it should be built around valuation, operations and the documentary proof of conduct that changed the business.

Claims And Remedies That Matter

Depending on the structure of the business and the facts, shareholder and partnership litigation may involve claims for breach of fiduciary duty, fraud, accounting, declaratory relief, books and records, injunctions, dissolution, removal of management authority, damages or other equitable relief. In some cases, the practical endgame is a buyout. In others, it is control, damages or a judicial resolution of who has what rights going forward.

The key is not to file the longest list of claims possible. It is to file the set of claims and requests for relief that actually create leverage and move the dispute toward a useful outcome.

Why New York City Businesses And Owners Hire Desai, Raveica, Raveica & Arshad, P.C.

Owner disputes can destroy value faster than almost any other commercial conflict because the business keeps operating while the fight escalates. Clients hire our firm because they want litigators who understand both the legal claims and the tactical realities: records, access, money movement, personnel influence and the danger of letting the other side create a new status quo while everyone argues.

We are a multiattorney firm with the depth to handle complex shareholder and partnership disputes in both state and federal court. Our attorneys are familiar with the U.S. District Court for the Southern District of New York and the U.S. District Court for the Eastern District of New York. We also offer low and competitive retainer fees because we want clients to move quickly when they need to, not delay action because of cost uncertainty.

We approach these cases with speed, pressure and precision. That means identifying the documents that matter, protecting the business where possible and using the right mix of demands, motions and discovery to force the dispute into the open.

How Long Does A Shareholder Or Partnership Dispute Take In New York?

The timeline depends on what relief you need and how the other side responds. A books-and-records demand can produce results in weeks if the company complies or months if litigation becomes necessary. A TRO application can be heard within days if the facts justify emergency relief. Full litigation typically takes 12 to 24 months from filing through trial, depending on discovery complexity and court scheduling. Negotiated resolutions happen at different stages. Some disputes settle after records are produced. Others settle after depositions or after a key motion changes the leverage. We focus on pressure and efficient resolution, not prolonged litigation.

What Are Warning Signs A Shareholder Or Partnership Dispute Is Coming?

Owner disputes rarely explode overnight. They build up over time. Recognizing the following warning signs early can determine whether you protect your position or lose ground before the fight starts:

• Sudden changes in access to financial information: If regular financial statements or tax returns suddenly stop, controlling owners may be preparing to squeeze you out.
• Unexplained compensation changes or distribution freezes: Selective payment cuts often precede formal disputes and signal minority freeze-outs.
• Exclusion from meetings or decision-making: Being cut out of board meetings or strategic discussions indicates a shift in how controlling owners view your role.
• Refusal to provide books and records: Delays or refusals to reasonable inspection requests often mean the other side is hiding something.
• Diversion of business opportunities or self-dealing: Co-owners competing with the company or running personal expenses through it breach fiduciary duties.
• Threats of buyout, dilution or removal: Take these seriously because they preview the litigation strategy.

The side that moves first on records, relief and leverage often controls the dispute.

How Is A Buyout Price Determined In A New York Business Divorce?

The buyout price depends on the governing documents, the valuation method and whether the buyout is voluntary or court-ordered. Many agreements specify a valuation formula such as book value, a multiple of earnings or an appraisal process. If the agreement does not specify a method, the court may order a fair-value determination, which typically involves expert valuation testimony. Fair value usually means the proportionate interest in the company as a going concern, without discounts for lack of marketability or minority status. Disputes over valuation can add months to the case and require forensic accountants and business appraisers. The side that controls the records and understands the numbers usually has the advantage.

Can You Sue Your Business Partner Or Co-Owner In New York?

Often, yes. But the available claims and remedies depend on the governing documents, the entity structure, the conduct at issue and what relief is actually needed – records access, injunctions, damages, dissolution, an accounting or a buyout-related process.

What If You Own 50% And Your Partner Is Blocking Everything?

Deadlock can create serious leverage issues quickly. The first questions are who controls operations, money, records, and vendor or employee relationships, and whether emergency or interim relief is needed to preserve the business while the dispute is litigated.

What Is Shareholder Oppression?

Shareholder oppression protects minority owners from being treated unfairly by those in control. Under Business Corporation Law Section 1104-a, shareholders can petition for judicial dissolution when controlling owners engage in oppressive conduct, even without fraud or theft. Oppression typically involves conduct that defeats the reasonable expectations the minority shareholder had when entering the relationship such as participating in management, receiving fair compensation or accessing company information. When the majority freezes out the minority by cutting salary, excluding them from decisions, refusing distributions or withholding information, that conduct can qualify as oppression. Courts evaluate the totality of circumstances and can order dissolution, court-ordered buyouts or other equitable relief.

Can A Minority Owner Force Access To Books And Records?

In many situations, yes – but the scope, procedure and best strategy depend on the entity documents and the specific facts. Records disputes are often a gateway issue because they determine how much of the real story becomes visible.

Can You Get An Emergency Injunction To Stop Your Business Partner From Taking Money From Your NYC Business?

Yes, if you can show immediate and irreparable harm and a likelihood of success on the merits. Courts can issue temporary restraining orders and preliminary injunctions to freeze bank accounts, stop unauthorized transfers, prevent destruction of records, or block other conduct that threatens the business or your ownership interest. The application requires sworn testimony, documentary evidence and a precise description of the relief you need. Emergency relief is not automatic. The court will want to see proof that money is actually moving, that the other side controls the accounts and that the conduct violates fiduciary duties or the governing agreement. Evidence matters more than argument.

What Should You Bring To The First Meeting About A Shareholder Or Partnership Dispute?

Bring the operating agreement, shareholder or partnership agreement, cap table or ownership records, recent financial statements, tax returns if available, bank access information, any disputed notices or demands, and a chronology of the conduct that triggered the dispute.

Move Before An Owner Dispute Hardens Against You

If a partner, shareholder or controlling owner is withholding records, diverting value, locking you out or pushing the business toward a destructive fight, contact Desai, Raveica, Raveica & Arshad, P.C. Call us at 332-251-0108. Early pressure often determines the shape of the case.

Desai, Raveica, Raveica & Arshad, P.C.
1350 6th Ave
2nd Floor
New York, NY 10019
Phone: 332-251-0108

Map & Directions